500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 160 WILLIAM T SAMPSON GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

459
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 651

LEVEL 1

74

11%

LEVEL 2

118

18%

LEVEL 3

193

30%

LEVEL 4

266

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

488
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 625

LEVEL 1

46

7%

LEVEL 2

91

15%

LEVEL 3

153

24%

LEVEL 4

335

54%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

210
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

66

22%

LEVEL 3

90

30%

LEVEL 4

120

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

223
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

45

16%

LEVEL 3

72

25%

LEVEL 4

151

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

249
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

47

14%

LEVEL 2

52

15%

LEVEL 3

103

30%

LEVEL 4

146

42%

MALE

PROFICIENT

265
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

46

14%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

184

55%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

428
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 559

LEVEL 1

42

8%

LEVEL 2

89

16%

LEVEL 3

171

31%

LEVEL 4

257

46%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

451
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

68

12%

LEVEL 3

134

25%

LEVEL 4

317

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

13
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

7

28%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

4

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

18
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

10

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

24

39%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

12

27%

LEVEL 2

17

38%

LEVEL 3

10

22%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

434
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

40

7%

LEVEL 2

102

18%

LEVEL 3

176

31%

LEVEL 4

258

45%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

459
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

24

4%

LEVEL 2

68

12%

LEVEL 3

139

25%

LEVEL 4

320

58%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

34

45%

LEVEL 2

16

21%

LEVEL 3

17

23%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

29
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

22

30%

LEVEL 2

23

31%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

15

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

283
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

34

10%

LEVEL 3

84

25%

LEVEL 4

199

59%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

330
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

14

4%

LEVEL 2

28

8%

LEVEL 3

72

19%

LEVEL 4

258

69%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

176
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

55

17%

LEVEL 2

84

27%

LEVEL 3

109

35%

LEVEL 4

67

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

158
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

81

32%

LEVEL 4

77

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

24

25%

LEVEL 4

41

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

17

18%

LEVEL 4

46

49%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

394
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

62

11%

LEVEL 2

100

18%

LEVEL 3

169

30%

LEVEL 4

225

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

425
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 532

LEVEL 1

37

7%

LEVEL 2

70

13%

LEVEL 3

136

26%

LEVEL 4

289

54%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

455
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 646

LEVEL 1

73

11%

LEVEL 2

118

18%

LEVEL 3

191

30%

LEVEL 4

264

41%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.