500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 112 LEFFERTS PARK GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

70

27%

LEVEL 3

108

42%

LEVEL 4

56

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

169
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

116

42%

LEVEL 4

53

19%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

31

27%

LEVEL 3

53

46%

LEVEL 4

26

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

53

44%

LEVEL 4

25

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

22

15%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

55

38%

LEVEL 4

30

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

39

26%

LEVEL 3

63

41%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

83
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

26

22%

LEVEL 3

51

43%

LEVEL 4

32

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

77
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

30

26%

LEVEL 3

45

39%

LEVEL 4

32

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

29

37%

LEVEL 3

32

41%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

18

18%

LEVEL 2

28

27%

LEVEL 3

43

42%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

54

24%

LEVEL 3

98

44%

LEVEL 4

56

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

49

22%

LEVEL 3

103

47%

LEVEL 4

53

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

16

42%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

16

31%

LEVEL 2

23

44%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

152
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

51

23%

LEVEL 3

97

44%

LEVEL 4

55

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

155
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

53

24%

LEVEL 3

102

45%

LEVEL 4

53

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

10

24%

LEVEL 2

19

46%

LEVEL 3

11

27%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

15

31%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

20

31%

LEVEL 4

23

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

28

43%

LEVEL 4

22

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

54

28%

LEVEL 3

88

45%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

119
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

88

42%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

159
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

68

27%

LEVEL 3

104

41%

LEVEL 4

55

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

168
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

69

26%

LEVEL 3

115

43%

LEVEL 4

53

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.