500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 186 DR IRVING A GLADSTONE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

272
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

109

22%

LEVEL 2

106

22%

LEVEL 3

134

28%

LEVEL 4

138

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

106

21%

LEVEL 2

122

24%

LEVEL 3

114

23%

LEVEL 4

161

32%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

50

23%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

56

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

53

23%

LEVEL 2

61

26%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

67

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

155
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

56

21%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

82

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

53

19%

LEVEL 2

61

22%

LEVEL 3

64

24%

LEVEL 4

94

35%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

143
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

31

14%

LEVEL 2

41

19%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

87

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

139
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

29

14%

LEVEL 2

39

19%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

92

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

27

20%

LEVEL 2

25

19%

LEVEL 3

45

34%

LEVEL 4

36

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

29

20%

LEVEL 2

34

24%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

44

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

50

37%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

29

22%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

48

32%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

30

20%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

253
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

68

17%

LEVEL 2

84

21%

LEVEL 3

120

30%

LEVEL 4

133

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

69

17%

LEVEL 2

97

24%

LEVEL 3

89

22%

LEVEL 4

152

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

41

50%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

14

17%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

34
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

37

39%

LEVEL 2

25

26%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

213
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

51

16%

LEVEL 2

65

20%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

117

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

229
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

52

15%

LEVEL 2

73

21%

LEVEL 3

86

24%

LEVEL 4

143

40%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

59
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

58

37%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

46
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

54

36%

LEVEL 2

49

33%

LEVEL 3

28

19%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

26

22%

LEVEL 2

21

18%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

44

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

24

22%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

41

38%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

83

22%

LEVEL 2

85

23%

LEVEL 3

107

29%

LEVEL 4

94

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

212
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

82

21%

LEVEL 2

102

26%

LEVEL 3

92

23%

LEVEL 4

120

30%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

266
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

103

22%

LEVEL 2

102

22%

LEVEL 3

132

28%

LEVEL 4

134

28%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

270
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

105

21%

LEVEL 2

119

24%

LEVEL 3

112

23%

LEVEL 4

158

32%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.