500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 102 BAYVIEW GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

376
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 633

LEVEL 1

104

16%

LEVEL 2

153

24%

LEVEL 3

166

26%

LEVEL 4

210

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

394
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 658

LEVEL 1

98

15%

LEVEL 2

166

25%

LEVEL 3

176

27%

LEVEL 4

218

33%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

177
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

75

25%

LEVEL 3

76

26%

LEVEL 4

101

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

183
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

88

28%

LEVEL 3

87

27%

LEVEL 4

96

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

199
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

60

18%

LEVEL 2

78

23%

LEVEL 3

90

27%

LEVEL 4

109

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

211
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

78

23%

LEVEL 3

89

26%

LEVEL 4

122

36%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

86
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

59

55%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

226
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

57

15%

LEVEL 2

93

25%

LEVEL 3

110

29%

LEVEL 4

116

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

242
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

86

23%

LEVEL 3

115

31%

LEVEL 4

127

34%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

43

27%

LEVEL 2

51

32%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

28

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

62
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

48

29%

LEVEL 2

57

34%

LEVEL 3

33

20%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

338
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

56

11%

LEVEL 2

123

24%

LEVEL 3

146

28%

LEVEL 4

192

37%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

357
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

51

9%

LEVEL 2

136

25%

LEVEL 3

154

28%

LEVEL 4

203

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

38
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

48

41%

LEVEL 2

30

26%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

18

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

37
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

47

41%

LEVEL 2

30

26%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

367
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

76

13%

LEVEL 2

136

23%

LEVEL 3

161

28%

LEVEL 4

206

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

383
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 594

LEVEL 1

64

11%

LEVEL 2

147

25%

LEVEL 3

171

29%

LEVEL 4

212

36%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

28

52%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

34

53%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

29

14%

LEVEL 3

50

25%

LEVEL 4

113

56%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

28

14%

LEVEL 3

55

27%

LEVEL 4

111

54%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

213
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

93

22%

LEVEL 2

124

29%

LEVEL 3

116

27%

LEVEL 4

97

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

228
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 453

LEVEL 1

87

19%

LEVEL 2

138

30%

LEVEL 3

121

27%

LEVEL 4

107

24%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.