500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

RALPH A FABRIZIO SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

113

26%

LEVEL 2

160

37%

LEVEL 3

127

29%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 479

LEVEL 1

129

27%

LEVEL 2

175

37%

LEVEL 3

130

27%

LEVEL 4

45

9%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

46

23%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

63

32%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

60

27%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

69

31%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

67

29%

LEVEL 2

91

39%

LEVEL 3

64

27%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

69

27%

LEVEL 2

108

43%

LEVEL 3

61

24%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

73
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

41

25%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

88
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

61

34%

LEVEL 4

27

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

44

25%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

50

29%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

54

28%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

35

35%

LEVEL 2

44

44%

LEVEL 3

18

18%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

79

22%

LEVEL 2

130

36%

LEVEL 3

121

33%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

81

21%

LEVEL 2

147

38%

LEVEL 3

119

31%

LEVEL 4

43

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

34

48%

LEVEL 2

30

42%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

48

54%

LEVEL 2

28

31%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

150
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

49

15%

LEVEL 2

129

39%

LEVEL 3

116

35%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

162
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

60

17%

LEVEL 2

140

39%

LEVEL 3

118

33%

LEVEL 4

44

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

64

60%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

69

59%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

17

47%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

12

41%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

111

28%

LEVEL 2

150

38%

LEVEL 3

110

28%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

158
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

128

28%

LEVEL 2

164

36%

LEVEL 3

118

26%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.