500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 247 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

278
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

93

23%

LEVEL 3

162

40%

LEVEL 4

116

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

88

21%

LEVEL 3

202

48%

LEVEL 4

86

21%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

157
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

44

21%

LEVEL 3

87

41%

LEVEL 4

70

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

152
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

37

19%

LEVEL 3

101

51%

LEVEL 4

51

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

20

11%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

75

39%

LEVEL 4

46

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

136
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

32

15%

LEVEL 2

51

23%

LEVEL 3

101

46%

LEVEL 4

35

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

147
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

44

22%

LEVEL 3

80

40%

LEVEL 4

67

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

163
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

44

20%

LEVEL 3

117

53%

LEVEL 4

46

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

31

21%

LEVEL 3

63

43%

LEVEL 4

37

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

27

19%

LEVEL 3

61

44%

LEVEL 4

33

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

17

5%

LEVEL 2

63

19%

LEVEL 3

143

43%

LEVEL 4

112

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

60

17%

LEVEL 3

185

53%

LEVEL 4

83

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

15

22%

LEVEL 2

30

44%

LEVEL 3

19

28%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

21

30%

LEVEL 2

28

41%

LEVEL 3

17

25%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

264
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

58

17%

LEVEL 3

150

45%

LEVEL 4

114

34%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

270
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

62

18%

LEVEL 3

184

53%

LEVEL 4

86

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

22

31%

LEVEL 2

35

49%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

18
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

25

36%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

26

19%

LEVEL 3

60

43%

LEVEL 4

43

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

31

24%

LEVEL 3

59

45%

LEVEL 4

28

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

67

25%

LEVEL 3

102

39%

LEVEL 4

73

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

57

20%

LEVEL 3

143

50%

LEVEL 4

58

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

275
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

90

23%

LEVEL 3

161

41%

LEVEL 4

114

29%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

286
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

39

9%

LEVEL 2

87

21%

LEVEL 3

200

49%

LEVEL 4

86

21%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.