500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 101 VERRAZANO GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

317
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

45

10%

LEVEL 2

73

17%

LEVEL 3

154

35%

LEVEL 4

163

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

312
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

49

11%

LEVEL 2

68

16%

LEVEL 3

168

39%

LEVEL 4

144

34%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

158
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

29

14%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

91

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

159
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

25

12%

LEVEL 3

85

41%

LEVEL 4

74

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

159
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

44

19%

LEVEL 3

87

38%

LEVEL 4

72

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

153
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

43

19%

LEVEL 3

83

37%

LEVEL 4

70

31%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

190
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

27

12%

LEVEL 3

80

34%

LEVEL 4

110

47%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

189
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

33

14%

LEVEL 3

93

40%

LEVEL 4

96

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

13

11%

LEVEL 2

20

18%

LEVEL 3

44

39%

LEVEL 4

37

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

16

15%

LEVEL 2

16

15%

LEVEL 3

47

43%

LEVEL 4

30

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

16

20%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

13

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

20

26%

LEVEL 2

18

24%

LEVEL 3

24

32%

LEVEL 4

14

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

42

13%

LEVEL 3

125

38%

LEVEL 4

154

46%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

270
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

11

3%

LEVEL 2

38

12%

LEVEL 3

138

43%

LEVEL 4

132

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

38
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

34

33%

LEVEL 2

31

30%

LEVEL 3

29

28%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

42
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

38

35%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

30

27%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

301
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

49

13%

LEVEL 3

140

38%

LEVEL 4

161

44%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

304
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

54

14%

LEVEL 3

160

42%

LEVEL 4

144

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

29

42%

LEVEL 2

24

35%

LEVEL 3

14

20%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

26

54%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

14

10%

LEVEL 3

51

35%

LEVEL 4

76

52%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

19

12%

LEVEL 3

60

38%

LEVEL 4

67

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

190
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

59

20%

LEVEL 3

103

36%

LEVEL 4

87

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

185
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

49

18%

LEVEL 3

108

40%

LEVEL 4

77

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.