500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 99 ISAAC ASIMOV GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

130

26%

LEVEL 2

151

30%

LEVEL 3

107

21%

LEVEL 4

111

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

197
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

170

34%

LEVEL 2

135

27%

LEVEL 3

90

18%

LEVEL 4

107

21%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

64

25%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

50

19%

LEVEL 4

61

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

79

31%

LEVEL 2

85

33%

LEVEL 3

41

16%

LEVEL 4

50

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

66

27%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

57

24%

LEVEL 4

50

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

91

37%

LEVEL 2

50

20%

LEVEL 3

49

20%

LEVEL 4

57

23%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

98
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

55

26%

LEVEL 2

60

28%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

48

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

89
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

61

28%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

48

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

76
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

29

21%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

27

20%

LEVEL 4

49

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

79
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

48

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

19

34%

LEVEL 2

24

43%

LEVEL 3

11

20%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

25

29%

LEVEL 2

33

39%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

47

57%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

80

20%

LEVEL 2

119

30%

LEVEL 3

98

24%

LEVEL 4

106

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

106

26%

LEVEL 2

116

28%

LEVEL 3

83

20%

LEVEL 4

106

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

50

52%

LEVEL 2

32

33%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

64

70%

LEVEL 2

19

21%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

202
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

54

15%

LEVEL 2

101

28%

LEVEL 3

94

26%

LEVEL 4

108

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

176
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

84

24%

LEVEL 2

83

24%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

103

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

76

54%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

13

9%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

21
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

86

54%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

17

11%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

47

23%

LEVEL 2

55

27%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

61

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

104
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

61

27%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

64

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

83

28%

LEVEL 2

96

33%

LEVEL 3

66

22%

LEVEL 4

50

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

109

39%

LEVEL 2

78

28%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

43

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.