500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 97 HIGHLAWN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

67

17%

LEVEL 2

92

24%

LEVEL 3

95

25%

LEVEL 4

132

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

85

22%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

158

41%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

110
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

28

16%

LEVEL 2

36

21%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

61

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

108
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

22

13%

LEVEL 2

39

23%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

66

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

117
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

39

18%

LEVEL 2

56

26%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

71

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

144
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

46

21%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

92

42%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

149
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

43

21%

LEVEL 3

48

23%

LEVEL 4

101

49%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

162
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

28

14%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

115

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

52
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

17

18%

LEVEL 2

23

25%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

27

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

16

14%

LEVEL 2

27

24%

LEVEL 3

32

29%

LEVEL 4

36

32%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

21

31%

LEVEL 2

28

41%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

26

8%

LEVEL 2

68

22%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

131

42%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

26

8%

LEVEL 2

59

18%

LEVEL 3

83

26%

LEVEL 4

154

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

41

55%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

24

37%

LEVEL 2

26

40%

LEVEL 3

11

17%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

200
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

76

27%

LEVEL 4

124

44%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

214
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

53

19%

LEVEL 3

75

26%

LEVEL 4

139

49%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

27
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

43

41%

LEVEL 2

36

34%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

38
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

33

32%

LEVEL 2

32

31%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

19

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

57

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

28

21%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

64

49%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

57

21%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

66

24%

LEVEL 4

75

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

160
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

57

22%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

94

37%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

226
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

63

17%

LEVEL 2

91

24%

LEVEL 3

94

25%

LEVEL 4

132

35%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

249
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

47

12%

LEVEL 2

81

21%

LEVEL 3

91

24%

LEVEL 4

158

42%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.