500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 253 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

45

13%

LEVEL 2

115

33%

LEVEL 3

108

31%

LEVEL 4

76

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

128

35%

LEVEL 3

109

30%

LEVEL 4

71

19%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

57

30%

LEVEL 4

43

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

93
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

69

37%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

41

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

51

33%

LEVEL 4

33

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

30

17%

LEVEL 2

59

34%

LEVEL 3

57

32%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

71
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

40

31%

LEVEL 4

31

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

71
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

19

14%

LEVEL 2

49

35%

LEVEL 3

44

32%

LEVEL 4

27

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

34
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

16

31%

LEVEL 4

18

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

77
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

72
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

63

38%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

92

34%

LEVEL 3

89

33%

LEVEL 4

60

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

50

17%

LEVEL 2

103

35%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

58

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

35
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

17

23%

LEVEL 2

23

31%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

16

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

40
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

25

35%

LEVEL 3

27

38%

LEVEL 4

13

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

166
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

87

31%

LEVEL 3

98

35%

LEVEL 4

68

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

161
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

68

22%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

18
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

16

26%

LEVEL 2

28

45%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

19
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

21

36%

LEVEL 2

19

32%

LEVEL 3

16

27%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

45

41%

LEVEL 4

19

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

44

17%

LEVEL 2

96

38%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.