500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 209 MARGARET MEAD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

85

23%

LEVEL 2

128

35%

LEVEL 3

98

27%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

83

22%

LEVEL 2

139

37%

LEVEL 3

108

29%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

34

19%

LEVEL 2

65

37%

LEVEL 3

48

27%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

40

20%

LEVEL 2

72

37%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

51

27%

LEVEL 2

63

33%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

43

24%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

21

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

52
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

22

21%

LEVEL 2

33

31%

LEVEL 3

28

26%

LEVEL 4

24

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

55
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

22

20%

LEVEL 2

35

31%

LEVEL 3

40

36%

LEVEL 4

15

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

29

18%

LEVEL 2

56

34%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

57

35%

LEVEL 3

53

32%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

29

35%

LEVEL 2

34

41%

LEVEL 3

16

19%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

28

32%

LEVEL 2

42

48%

LEVEL 3

12

14%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

96

36%

LEVEL 3

92

34%

LEVEL 4

53

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

35

13%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

100

36%

LEVEL 4

45

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

58

59%

LEVEL 2

32

33%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

48

50%

LEVEL 2

39

41%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

143
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

47

16%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

91

31%

LEVEL 4

52

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

140
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

117

38%

LEVEL 3

97

32%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

38

53%

LEVEL 2

24

33%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

36

50%

LEVEL 2

22

31%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

21

37%

LEVEL 4

20

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

19

33%

LEVEL 3

20

34%

LEVEL 4

12

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

81

26%

LEVEL 2

116

38%

LEVEL 3

77

25%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

76

24%

LEVEL 2

120

38%

LEVEL 3

88

28%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.