500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 209 MARGARET MEAD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

81

20%

LEVEL 2

121

29%

LEVEL 3

133

32%

LEVEL 4

80

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

79

19%

LEVEL 2

104

25%

LEVEL 3

143

35%

LEVEL 4

82

20%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

29

15%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

69

35%

LEVEL 4

44

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

42

21%

LEVEL 3

81

41%

LEVEL 4

46

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

52

24%

LEVEL 2

64

30%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

36

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

48

23%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

36

17%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

84
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

28

22%

LEVEL 3

47

37%

LEVEL 4

37

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

89
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

48

38%

LEVEL 4

41

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

56

32%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

61

37%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

27

27%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

30

30%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

30

29%

LEVEL 2

31

30%

LEVEL 3

31

30%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

113

38%

LEVEL 4

70

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

65

22%

LEVEL 3

128

44%

LEVEL 4

77

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

50

44%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

55

48%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

15

13%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

201
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

48

14%

LEVEL 2

94

27%

LEVEL 3

123

36%

LEVEL 4

78

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

216
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

46

14%

LEVEL 2

78

23%

LEVEL 3

134

39%

LEVEL 4

82

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

33

46%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

33

49%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

9

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

9

11%

LEVEL 2

24

29%

LEVEL 3

26

32%

LEVEL 4

23

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

48

42%

LEVEL 4

28

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

72

22%

LEVEL 2

97

29%

LEVEL 3

107

32%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

64

22%

LEVEL 2

80

27%

LEVEL 3

95

32%

LEVEL 4

54

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

200
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

74

19%

LEVEL 2

113

29%

LEVEL 3

124

32%

LEVEL 4

76

20%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

213
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

72

19%

LEVEL 2

96

25%

LEVEL 3

132

35%

LEVEL 4

81

21%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

7

25%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

7

26%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

11

41%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.