500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 226 ALFRED DE B MASON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

127

22%

LEVEL 2

187

32%

LEVEL 3

156

27%

LEVEL 4

117

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

344
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

84

14%

LEVEL 2

170

28%

LEVEL 3

178

30%

LEVEL 4

166

28%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

91

32%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

74

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

201
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

71

24%

LEVEL 3

88

30%

LEVEL 4

113

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

92

30%

LEVEL 2

96

31%

LEVEL 3

75

25%

LEVEL 4

43

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

63

21%

LEVEL 2

99

32%

LEVEL 3

90

30%

LEVEL 4

53

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

87
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

35

20%

LEVEL 2

55

31%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

43

24%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

113
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

48

25%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

64

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

41

18%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

67

30%

LEVEL 4

51

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

151
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

82

36%

LEVEL 4

69

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

48

29%

LEVEL 2

61

37%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

36

21%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

30

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

81

16%

LEVEL 2

162

32%

LEVEL 3

149

29%

LEVEL 4

115

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

328
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

50

10%

LEVEL 2

139

27%

LEVEL 3

164

32%

LEVEL 4

164

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

46

58%

LEVEL 2

25

31%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

34

42%

LEVEL 2

31

38%

LEVEL 3

14

17%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

271
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

69

14%

LEVEL 2

162

32%

LEVEL 3

154

31%

LEVEL 4

117

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

328
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

42

9%

LEVEL 2

122

25%

LEVEL 3

163

33%

LEVEL 4

165

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

58

68%

LEVEL 2

25

29%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

42

40%

LEVEL 2

48

45%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

21

22%

LEVEL 3

33

34%

LEVEL 4

31

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

9

11%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

20

25%

LEVEL 4

36

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

209
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

115

23%

LEVEL 2

166

34%

LEVEL 3

123

25%

LEVEL 4

86

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

288
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 518

LEVEL 1

75

14%

LEVEL 2

155

30%

LEVEL 3

158

31%

LEVEL 4

130

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.