500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 226 ALFRED DE B MASON GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

139

26%

LEVEL 2

214

39%

LEVEL 3

144

27%

LEVEL 4

45

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 564

LEVEL 1

134

24%

LEVEL 2

205

36%

LEVEL 3

163

29%

LEVEL 4

62

11%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

59

23%

LEVEL 2

96

38%

LEVEL 3

76

30%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

47

17%

LEVEL 2

103

38%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

37

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

80

28%

LEVEL 2

118

41%

LEVEL 3

68

24%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

102
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

87

30%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

66
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

26

19%

LEVEL 2

48

34%

LEVEL 3

50

36%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

69
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

31

22%

LEVEL 2

42

30%

LEVEL 3

48

34%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

57

25%

LEVEL 2

91

40%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

98
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

87

37%

LEVEL 3

72

31%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

52

32%

LEVEL 2

69

43%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

52

30%

LEVEL 2

72

41%

LEVEL 3

40

23%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

81

18%

LEVEL 2

186

41%

LEVEL 3

137

31%

LEVEL 4

45

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

220
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 471

LEVEL 1

72

15%

LEVEL 2

179

38%

LEVEL 3

159

34%

LEVEL 4

61

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

58

62%

LEVEL 2

28

30%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

62

67%

LEVEL 2

26

28%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

186
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

96

20%

LEVEL 2

202

42%

LEVEL 3

141

29%

LEVEL 4

45

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

222
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

85

17%

LEVEL 2

192

38%

LEVEL 3

161

32%

LEVEL 4

61

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

43

74%

LEVEL 2

12

21%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

49

75%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

31

48%

LEVEL 4

9

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

10

12%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

34

42%

LEVEL 4

15

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

131

27%

LEVEL 2

197

41%

LEVEL 3

113

24%

LEVEL 4

36

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

176
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

124

26%

LEVEL 2

183

38%

LEVEL 3

129

27%

LEVEL 4

47

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.