500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 216 ARTURO TOSCANINI GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

111

36%

LEVEL 4

62

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

50

16%

LEVEL 2

95

31%

LEVEL 3

98

32%

LEVEL 4

66

21%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

57

38%

LEVEL 4

29

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

57

36%

LEVEL 4

31

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

54

34%

LEVEL 4

33

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

46

30%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

35

23%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

19

24%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

12

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

13

18%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

23

32%

LEVEL 4

15

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

36

23%

LEVEL 3

58

38%

LEVEL 4

45

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

46

28%

LEVEL 3

58

35%

LEVEL 4

41

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

7

12%

LEVEL 2

29

51%

LEVEL 3

18

32%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

13

23%

LEVEL 2

21

37%

LEVEL 3

14

25%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

102

38%

LEVEL 4

61

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

89

35%

LEVEL 4

64

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

15

39%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

23

43%

LEVEL 2

20

37%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

169
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

70

27%

LEVEL 3

107

41%

LEVEL 4

62

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

158
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

92

37%

LEVEL 4

66

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

25

52%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

26

46%

LEVEL 2

25

44%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

8

11%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

26

35%

LEVEL 4

25

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

11

15%

LEVEL 2

17

23%

LEVEL 3

27

36%

LEVEL 4

20

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

122
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

74

32%

LEVEL 3

85

36%

LEVEL 4

37

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

39

17%

LEVEL 2

78

33%

LEVEL 3

71

30%

LEVEL 4

46

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

168
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

106

35%

LEVEL 4

62

21%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

160
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

89

30%

LEVEL 3

97

33%

LEVEL 4

63

21%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

5

56%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.