500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 139 ALEXINE A FENTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

153

35%

LEVEL 2

116

27%

LEVEL 3

106

24%

LEVEL 4

58

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

168

39%

LEVEL 2

118

27%

LEVEL 3

86

20%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

95
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

71

29%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

82

36%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

33

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

82

43%

LEVEL 2

40

21%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

86

43%

LEVEL 2

51

25%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

15

21%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

19

27%

LEVEL 4

15

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

20

25%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

21

26%

LEVEL 4

19

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

30
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

11

23%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

16

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

10

27%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

14

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

53

40%

LEVEL 2

43

33%

LEVEL 3

27

20%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

57

44%

LEVEL 2

35

27%

LEVEL 3

27

21%

LEVEL 4

10

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

70

40%

LEVEL 2

44

25%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

75

43%

LEVEL 2

57

33%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

102

28%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

104

30%

LEVEL 2

108

31%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

51

76%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

64

81%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

156
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

105

29%

LEVEL 2

106

29%

LEVEL 3

98

27%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

141
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

111

31%

LEVEL 2

110

30%

LEVEL 3

84

23%

LEVEL 4

57

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

48

73%

LEVEL 2

10

15%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

57

83%

LEVEL 2

8

12%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

10

16%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

21

33%

LEVEL 4

17

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

17

26%

LEVEL 2

12

18%

LEVEL 3

18

27%

LEVEL 4

19

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

126
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 369

LEVEL 1

143

39%

LEVEL 2

100

27%

LEVEL 3

85

23%

LEVEL 4

41

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

151

41%

LEVEL 2

106

29%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

40

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.