500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 139 ALEXINE A FENTY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 427

LEVEL 1

123

29%

LEVEL 2

161

38%

LEVEL 3

95

22%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

129

31%

LEVEL 2

128

31%

LEVEL 3

119

29%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

91

40%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

35

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

42

21%

LEVEL 2

67

33%

LEVEL 3

69

34%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

73

37%

LEVEL 2

70

35%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

87

41%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

18

23%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

27

35%

LEVEL 4

12

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

34
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

18

24%

LEVEL 2

23

31%

LEVEL 3

22

29%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

19
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

8

24%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

11

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

7

22%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

13

41%

LEVEL 4

9

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

34

26%

LEVEL 2

55

42%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

43
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

40

32%

LEVEL 2

41

33%

LEVEL 3

36

29%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

60

34%

LEVEL 2

76

43%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

49
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

62

36%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

42

25%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

68

20%

LEVEL 2

141

41%

LEVEL 3

92

26%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

74

22%

LEVEL 2

113

34%

LEVEL 3

114

34%

LEVEL 4

36

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

55

70%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

55

73%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

138
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

77

21%

LEVEL 2

147

41%

LEVEL 3

91

25%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

150
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

86

25%

LEVEL 2

115

33%

LEVEL 3

114

32%

LEVEL 4

36

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

46

71%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

43

70%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

8

12%

LEVEL 2

23

34%

LEVEL 3

23

34%

LEVEL 4

14

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

11

16%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

30

44%

LEVEL 4

12

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

115

32%

LEVEL 2

138

38%

LEVEL 3

72

20%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

118

34%

LEVEL 2

113

33%

LEVEL 3

89

26%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

131
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

109

28%

LEVEL 2

146

38%

LEVEL 3

92

24%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

139
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

114

31%

LEVEL 2

111

30%

LEVEL 3

106

29%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

14

34%

LEVEL 2

15

37%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

9

22%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

15

31%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.