500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 134 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

37

13%

LEVEL 3

78

28%

LEVEL 4

154

55%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

31

11%

LEVEL 3

80

27%

LEVEL 4

170

58%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

20

13%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

85

56%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

17

11%

LEVEL 3

46

31%

LEVEL 4

80

54%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

17

13%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

69

53%

MALE

PROFICIENT

124
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

14

10%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

90

62%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

107
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

3

3%

LEVEL 2

8

7%

LEVEL 3

27

23%

LEVEL 4

80

68%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

126
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

34

24%

LEVEL 4

92

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

90
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

13

12%

LEVEL 3

33

30%

LEVEL 4

57

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

10

9%

LEVEL 3

33

30%

LEVEL 4

60

54%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

10

38%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

11

50%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

25

10%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

146

60%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

226
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

23

9%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

157

61%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

12

33%

LEVEL 3

12

33%

LEVEL 4

8

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

11

30%

LEVEL 4

13

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

210
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

26

11%

LEVEL 3

63

26%

LEVEL 4

147

61%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

235
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

166

65%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

22
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

7

18%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

15

38%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

15
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

14

35%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

5

9%

LEVEL 3

16

29%

LEVEL 4

33

60%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

20

65%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

183
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

32

14%

LEVEL 3

62

27%

LEVEL 4

121

54%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

222
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

29

11%

LEVEL 3

72

27%

LEVEL 4

150

57%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

197
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

33

14%

LEVEL 3

67

28%

LEVEL 4

130

54%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

215
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

28

11%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

146

57%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

35
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

11

27%

LEVEL 4

24

59%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

35
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

24

63%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.