500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 203 FLOYD BENNETT SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

121

35%

LEVEL 2

118

34%

LEVEL 3

73

21%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

100

31%

LEVEL 2

127

39%

LEVEL 3

72

22%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

60

36%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

49

29%

LEVEL 2

65

38%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

61

34%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

51

32%

LEVEL 2

62

39%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

16

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

82
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

102

36%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

58

21%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

77
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

87

32%

LEVEL 2

109

40%

LEVEL 3

55

20%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

9

28%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

77

28%

LEVEL 2

104

38%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

106

41%

LEVEL 3

67

26%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

44

67%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

38

58%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

102
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

97

31%

LEVEL 2

113

36%

LEVEL 3

71

23%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

100
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

87

28%

LEVEL 2

122

39%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

28

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

24

77%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

13

72%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

43

29%

LEVEL 2

57

39%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

57

32%

LEVEL 2

70

39%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.