500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 203 FLOYD BENNETT SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

106

30%

LEVEL 2

147

42%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

86

28%

LEVEL 2

107

34%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

39

23%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

33

22%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

67

38%

LEVEL 2

83

47%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

53

33%

LEVEL 2

57

35%

LEVEL 3

43

27%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

6

86%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

5

33%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

80
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

77

28%

LEVEL 2

117

43%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

97
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

70

28%

LEVEL 2

79

32%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

19

41%

LEVEL 2

17

37%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

8

24%

LEVEL 2

15

45%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

58

22%

LEVEL 2

118

44%

LEVEL 3

69

26%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

44

19%

LEVEL 2

82

36%

LEVEL 3

77

34%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

48

57%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

42

51%

LEVEL 2

25

30%

LEVEL 3

16

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

96
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

89

27%

LEVEL 2

143

44%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

115
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

72

25%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

89

31%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

17

77%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

14

48%

LEVEL 2

11

38%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

42

28%

LEVEL 2

63

43%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

29

29%

LEVEL 2

28

28%

LEVEL 3

34

34%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

64

32%

LEVEL 2

84

42%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

57

27%

LEVEL 2

79

37%

LEVEL 3

59

28%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.