500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 323 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

132

45%

LEVEL 2

112

38%

LEVEL 3

44

15%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

128

48%

LEVEL 2

104

39%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

34
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

63

40%

LEVEL 2

59

38%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

63

44%

LEVEL 2

52

36%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

16
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

69

50%

LEVEL 2

53

38%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

9
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

65

52%

LEVEL 2

52

41%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

109

45%

LEVEL 2

90

38%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

28
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

106

48%

LEVEL 2

85

39%

LEVEL 3

23

11%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

22

49%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

91

39%

LEVEL 2

95

40%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

34
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

88

42%

LEVEL 2

89

42%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

41

69%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

40

69%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

49
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

126

44%

LEVEL 2

109

38%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

37
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

125

48%

LEVEL 2

101

38%

LEVEL 3

30

11%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

25

53%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

18

42%

LEVEL 2

18

42%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

107

43%

LEVEL 2

94

38%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

110

49%

LEVEL 2

86

38%

LEVEL 3

23

10%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.