500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 156 WAVERLY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

174

50%

LEVEL 2

114

33%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

193

54%

LEVEL 2

115

32%

LEVEL 3

39

11%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

69

42%

LEVEL 2

70

42%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

82

49%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

17

10%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

105

58%

LEVEL 2

44

24%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

24
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

111

58%

LEVEL 2

55

29%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

51
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

142

50%

LEVEL 2

89

32%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

41
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

156

53%

LEVEL 2

96

33%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

29

50%

LEVEL 2

23

40%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

34

61%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

115

42%

LEVEL 2

101

37%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

128

46%

LEVEL 2

105

38%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

59

80%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

65

83%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

59
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

167

50%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

11

32%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

18

46%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

163

52%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

38

12%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

175

55%

LEVEL 2

101

32%

LEVEL 3

34

11%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.