500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

EAST NEW YORK FAMILY ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

85

44%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

64
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

53

26%

LEVEL 2

85

42%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

42
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

12

12%

LEVEL 2

45

45%

LEVEL 3

28

28%

LEVEL 4

14

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

19

19%

LEVEL 2

45

45%

LEVEL 3

26

26%

LEVEL 4

11

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

21

22%

LEVEL 2

40

42%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

34

34%

LEVEL 2

40

40%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

4

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

44
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

24

18%

LEVEL 2

62

48%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

36

26%

LEVEL 2

66

47%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

17

33%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

16

33%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

13

27%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

78

46%

LEVEL 3

50

30%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

77

45%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

17

68%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

20

65%

LEVEL 2

8

26%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

64
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

48

24%

LEVEL 2

84

43%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

14

44%

LEVEL 3

10

31%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

18

41%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

4

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

27

17%

LEVEL 2

71

44%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

44

28%

LEVEL 2

67

42%

LEVEL 3

35

22%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.