500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MEDGAR EVERS COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

44

15%

LEVEL 3

102

34%

LEVEL 4

153

51%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

297
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

43

13%

LEVEL 3

113

33%

LEVEL 4

184

53%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

143
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

20

12%

LEVEL 3

53

32%

LEVEL 4

90

55%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

163
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

20

11%

LEVEL 3

52

28%

LEVEL 4

111

60%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

49

36%

LEVEL 4

63

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

23

14%

LEVEL 3

61

38%

LEVEL 4

73

46%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

14
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

7

50%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

13
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

9

69%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

71%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

222
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

39

15%

LEVEL 3

86

33%

LEVEL 4

136

52%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

263
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

38

12%

LEVEL 3

102

33%

LEVEL 4

161

53%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

8

57%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

25

32%

LEVEL 4

46

58%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

96
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

10

9%

LEVEL 3

35

32%

LEVEL 4

61

56%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

184
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

37

17%

LEVEL 3

77

35%

LEVEL 4

107

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

201
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

33

14%

LEVEL 3

78

33%

LEVEL 4

123

52%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.