500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 81 JEAN PAUL RICHTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

178
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

133

25%

LEVEL 2

215

41%

LEVEL 3

122

23%

LEVEL 4

56

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

122

25%

LEVEL 2

170

35%

LEVEL 3

134

27%

LEVEL 4

65

13%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

57

22%

LEVEL 2

106

41%

LEVEL 3

66

25%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

54

22%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

64

26%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

76

28%

LEVEL 2

109

41%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

99
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

68

28%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

70

29%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

11

26%

LEVEL 3

18

43%

LEVEL 4

8

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

7

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

9

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

135
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

116

26%

LEVEL 2

197

44%

LEVEL 3

95

21%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

161
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

113

27%

LEVEL 2

145

35%

LEVEL 3

111

26%

LEVEL 4

50

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

66

17%

LEVEL 2

169

42%

LEVEL 3

108

27%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

68

18%

LEVEL 2

126

34%

LEVEL 3

114

31%

LEVEL 4

62

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

67

53%

LEVEL 2

46

36%

LEVEL 3

14

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

23
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

54

45%

LEVEL 2

44

36%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

167
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

93

21%

LEVEL 2

177

41%

LEVEL 3

111

25%

LEVEL 4

56

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

186
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

96

23%

LEVEL 2

136

33%

LEVEL 3

121

29%

LEVEL 4

65

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

40

45%

LEVEL 2

38

43%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

26

36%

LEVEL 2

34

47%

LEVEL 3

13

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

42

37%

LEVEL 3

37

32%

LEVEL 4

18

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

105

28%

LEVEL 2

128

34%

LEVEL 3

97

26%

LEVEL 4

47

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.