500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

IS 93 RIDGEWOOD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 919

LEVEL 1

339

37%

LEVEL 2

282

31%

LEVEL 3

185

20%

LEVEL 4

113

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

270
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 713

LEVEL 1

221

31%

LEVEL 2

222

31%

LEVEL 3

159

22%

LEVEL 4

111

16%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

151

35%

LEVEL 2

132

31%

LEVEL 3

88

21%

LEVEL 4

58

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

107

31%

LEVEL 2

108

31%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

53

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

188

38%

LEVEL 2

150

31%

LEVEL 3

97

20%

LEVEL 4

55

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

138
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

114

31%

LEVEL 2

114

31%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

16

23%

LEVEL 2

14

20%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

24

34%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

11

19%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

13

22%

LEVEL 4

26

45%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

78
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

49

32%

LEVEL 2

26

17%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

36

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

26

21%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

30

25%

LEVEL 4

32

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

175
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 678

LEVEL 1

268

40%

LEVEL 2

235

35%

LEVEL 3

124

18%

LEVEL 4

51

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

159
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

177

35%

LEVEL 2

175

34%

LEVEL 3

108

21%

LEVEL 4

51

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

281
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 735

LEVEL 1

209

28%

LEVEL 2

245

33%

LEVEL 3

172

23%

LEVEL 4

109

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 580

LEVEL 1

135

23%

LEVEL 2

189

33%

LEVEL 3

148

26%

LEVEL 4

108

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

130

71%

LEVEL 2

37

20%

LEVEL 3

13

7%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

86

65%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

282
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 760

LEVEL 1

235

31%

LEVEL 2

243

32%

LEVEL 3

173

23%

LEVEL 4

109

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

260
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

150

25%

LEVEL 2

197

32%

LEVEL 3

151

25%

LEVEL 4

109

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

104

65%

LEVEL 2

39

25%

LEVEL 3

12

8%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

71

67%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

14

28%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

13

26%

LEVEL 4

11

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

16

19%

LEVEL 2

25

30%

LEVEL 3

25

30%

LEVEL 4

17

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

274
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 869

LEVEL 1

325

37%

LEVEL 2

270

31%

LEVEL 3

172

20%

LEVEL 4

102

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

228
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

205

33%

LEVEL 2

197

31%

LEVEL 3

134

21%

LEVEL 4

94

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

280
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 853

LEVEL 1

315

37%

LEVEL 2

258

30%

LEVEL 3

175

21%

LEVEL 4

105

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

254
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 679

LEVEL 1

211

31%

LEVEL 2

214

32%

LEVEL 3

148

22%

LEVEL 4

106

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

18
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

24

36%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

16
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

11

32%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.