500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 7 LOUIS F SIMEONE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

39

13%

LEVEL 2

75

25%

LEVEL 3

118

40%

LEVEL 4

65

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

85

33%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

53

21%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

43

31%

LEVEL 3

50

36%

LEVEL 4

30

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

38

34%

LEVEL 3

44

39%

LEVEL 4

21

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

32

20%

LEVEL 3

68

43%

LEVEL 4

35

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

30

21%

LEVEL 2

47

33%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

32

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

132
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

30

17%

LEVEL 3

81

46%

LEVEL 4

51

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

100
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

42

28%

LEVEL 3

51

34%

LEVEL 4

49

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

24

22%

LEVEL 2

41

38%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

59

23%

LEVEL 3

111

43%

LEVEL 4

63

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

78

36%

LEVEL 3

73

33%

LEVEL 4

47

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

13

34%

LEVEL 2

16

42%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

19

50%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

128
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

42

24%

LEVEL 3

79

45%

LEVEL 4

49

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

41

32%

LEVEL 4

34

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

55
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

32

27%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

57
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

31

24%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

16

52%

LEVEL 4

7

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

13

59%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

160
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

36

14%

LEVEL 2

70

26%

LEVEL 3

102

38%

LEVEL 4

58

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

117
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

80

34%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

51

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.