500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 7 LOUIS F SIMEONE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

71

28%

LEVEL 2

97

39%

LEVEL 3

77

31%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

61

24%

LEVEL 2

82

33%

LEVEL 3

92

37%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

24

22%

LEVEL 2

45

41%

LEVEL 3

36

33%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

29

24%

LEVEL 2

42

35%

LEVEL 3

39

33%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

47

33%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

32

25%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

53

41%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

62
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

60

41%

LEVEL 3

58

40%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

78
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

50

31%

LEVEL 3

68

43%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

27

33%

LEVEL 2

32

39%

LEVEL 3

20

24%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

44

21%

LEVEL 2

88

41%

LEVEL 3

75

35%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

38

18%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

87

41%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

27

71%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

23

59%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

62
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

13

10%

LEVEL 2

53

41%

LEVEL 3

56

44%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

93
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

79

53%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

21
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

58

47%

LEVEL 2

44

36%

LEVEL 3

21

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

49

49%

LEVEL 2

38

38%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

13

32%

LEVEL 3

19

46%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

68

30%

LEVEL 2

88

38%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

56

27%

LEVEL 2

69

33%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.