500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 128 LORRAINE TUZZO-JUNIPER VALLEY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

397
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

76

13%

LEVEL 2

134

22%

LEVEL 3

156

26%

LEVEL 4

241

40%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

409
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

77

13%

LEVEL 2

121

20%

LEVEL 3

149

25%

LEVEL 4

260

43%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

212
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

67

21%

LEVEL 3

85

27%

LEVEL 4

127

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

219
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

55

18%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

133

43%

MALE

PROFICIENT

185
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

67

23%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

114

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

190
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

44

15%

LEVEL 2

66

22%

LEVEL 3

63

21%

LEVEL 4

127

42%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

14

61%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

324
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

45

10%

LEVEL 2

92

20%

LEVEL 3

125

27%

LEVEL 4

199

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

335
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

45

10%

LEVEL 2

85

18%

LEVEL 3

123

26%

LEVEL 4

212

46%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

27

23%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

23

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

29

25%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

31

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

378
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

42

8%

LEVEL 2

102

20%

LEVEL 3

143

27%

LEVEL 4

235

45%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

387
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 529

LEVEL 1

56

11%

LEVEL 2

86

16%

LEVEL 3

136

26%

LEVEL 4

251

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

34

40%

LEVEL 2

32

38%

LEVEL 3

13

15%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

21

27%

LEVEL 2

35

45%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

394
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 588

LEVEL 1

68

12%

LEVEL 2

126

21%

LEVEL 3

154

26%

LEVEL 4

240

41%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

407
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 593

LEVEL 1

70

12%

LEVEL 2

116

20%

LEVEL 3

147

25%

LEVEL 4

260

44%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

8

42%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

281
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

80

20%

LEVEL 3

105

26%

LEVEL 4

176

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

323
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

89

19%

LEVEL 3

112

24%

LEVEL 4

211

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

116
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

54

26%

LEVEL 3

51

25%

LEVEL 4

65

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

30

20%

LEVEL 2

32

22%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

49

33%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

391
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

76

13%

LEVEL 2

132

22%

LEVEL 3

155

26%

LEVEL 4

236

39%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

400
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 597

LEVEL 1

77

13%

LEVEL 2

120

20%

LEVEL 3

145

24%

LEVEL 4

255

43%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

5

63%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.