500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 119 GLENDALE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

332
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 602

LEVEL 1

107

18%

LEVEL 2

163

27%

LEVEL 3

102

17%

LEVEL 4

230

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

343
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 600

LEVEL 1

121

20%

LEVEL 2

136

23%

LEVEL 3

100

17%

LEVEL 4

243

41%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

170
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

49

17%

LEVEL 2

68

24%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

121

42%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

57

20%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

134

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

162
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

58

18%

LEVEL 2

95

30%

LEVEL 3

53

17%

LEVEL 4

109

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

169
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

63

20%

LEVEL 2

79

25%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

109

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

97
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

11

10%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

87

78%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

105
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

9

7%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

98

81%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

49

18%

LEVEL 2

75

28%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

98

36%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

155
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

46

18%

LEVEL 2

61

23%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

102

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

82
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

51

25%

LEVEL 2

73

35%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

41

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

65

31%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

40

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

324
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

47

9%

LEVEL 2

131

26%

LEVEL 3

96

19%

LEVEL 4

228

45%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

336
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

64

12%

LEVEL 2

113

22%

LEVEL 3

96

19%

LEVEL 4

240

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

60

60%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

57

66%

LEVEL 2

23

26%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

332
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

99

17%

LEVEL 2

151

26%

LEVEL 3

102

18%

LEVEL 4

230

40%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

338
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

103

18%

LEVEL 2

129

23%

LEVEL 3

98

17%

LEVEL 4

240

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

8

40%

LEVEL 2

12

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

18

60%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

27

20%

LEVEL 3

26

19%

LEVEL 4

72

53%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

18

11%

LEVEL 2

28

18%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

86

54%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

234
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

97

21%

LEVEL 2

136

29%

LEVEL 3

76

16%

LEVEL 4

158

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

229
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

103

23%

LEVEL 2

108

25%

LEVEL 3

72

16%

LEVEL 4

157

36%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.