500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

NYC GEOG DIST #25 - QUEENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,326
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,679

LEVEL 1

2,386

15%

LEVEL 2

3,967

25%

LEVEL 3

4,201

27%

LEVEL 4

5,125

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

10,021
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,591

LEVEL 1

2,444

16%

LEVEL 2

3,126

20%

LEVEL 3

4,099

26%

LEVEL 4

5,922

38%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,500
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,509

LEVEL 1

1,064

14%

LEVEL 2

1,945

26%

LEVEL 3

2,013

27%

LEVEL 4

2,487

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

4,840
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,484

LEVEL 1

1,120

15%

LEVEL 2

1,524

20%

LEVEL 3

1,975

26%

LEVEL 4

2,865

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

4,826
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,170

LEVEL 1

1,322

16%

LEVEL 2

2,022

25%

LEVEL 3

2,188

27%

LEVEL 4

2,638

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

5,181
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,107

LEVEL 1

1,324

16%

LEVEL 2

1,602

20%

LEVEL 3

2,124

26%

LEVEL 4

3,057

38%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

74
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

28

24%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

46

39%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

80
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

18

15%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

37

31%

LEVEL 4

43

36%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

19
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

13

25%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

26
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

16

28%

LEVEL 2

15

26%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6,545
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,726

LEVEL 1

577

7%

LEVEL 2

1,604

18%

LEVEL 3

2,488

29%

LEVEL 4

4,057

46%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6,935
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,780

LEVEL 1

596

7%

LEVEL 2

1,249

14%

LEVEL 3

2,336

27%

LEVEL 4

4,599

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,130
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,121

LEVEL 1

333

16%

LEVEL 2

658

31%

LEVEL 3

633

30%

LEVEL 4

497

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1,189
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,014

LEVEL 1

329

16%

LEVEL 2

496

25%

LEVEL 3

598

30%

LEVEL 4

591

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

194
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 732

LEVEL 1

268

37%

LEVEL 2

270

37%

LEVEL 3

142

19%

LEVEL 4

52

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

216
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 680

LEVEL 1

265

39%

LEVEL 2

199

29%

LEVEL 3

143

21%

LEVEL 4

73

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,364
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,931

LEVEL 1

1,180

30%

LEVEL 2

1,387

35%

LEVEL 3

901

23%

LEVEL 4

463

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1,575
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,939

LEVEL 1

1,220

31%

LEVEL 2

1,144

29%

LEVEL 3

968

25%

LEVEL 4

607

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

8,839
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,381

LEVEL 1

1,323

10%

LEVEL 2

3,219

24%

LEVEL 3

3,879

29%

LEVEL 4

4,960

37%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

9,419
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,307

LEVEL 1

1,379

10%

LEVEL 2

2,509

19%

LEVEL 3

3,705

28%

LEVEL 4

5,714

43%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

487
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,298

LEVEL 1

1,063

46%

LEVEL 2

748

33%

LEVEL 3

322

14%

LEVEL 4

165

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

602
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,284

LEVEL 1

1,065

47%

LEVEL 2

617

27%

LEVEL 3

394

17%

LEVEL 4

208

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8,251
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 13,039

LEVEL 1

1,624

12%

LEVEL 2

3,164

24%

LEVEL 3

3,559

27%

LEVEL 4

4,692

36%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8,843
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,876

LEVEL 1

1,638

13%

LEVEL 2

2,395

19%

LEVEL 3

3,380

26%

LEVEL 4

5,463

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1,075
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,640

LEVEL 1

762

29%

LEVEL 2

803

30%

LEVEL 3

642

24%

LEVEL 4

433

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1,178
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,715

LEVEL 1

806

30%

LEVEL 2

731

27%

LEVEL 3

719

26%

LEVEL 4

459

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,253
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,040

LEVEL 1

642

13%

LEVEL 2

1,145

23%

LEVEL 3

1,413

28%

LEVEL 4

1,840

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2,972
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,261

LEVEL 1

527

12%

LEVEL 2

762

18%

LEVEL 3

1,107

26%

LEVEL 4

1,865

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

6,073
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 10,639

LEVEL 1

1,744

16%

LEVEL 2

2,822

27%

LEVEL 3

2,788

26%

LEVEL 4

3,285

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7,049
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 11,330

LEVEL 1

1,917

17%

LEVEL 2

2,364

21%

LEVEL 3

2,992

26%

LEVEL 4

4,057

36%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.