500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 129 PATRICIA LARKIN GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

376
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

56

11%

LEVEL 2

101

19%

LEVEL 3

156

29%

LEVEL 4

220

41%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

392
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

52

10%

LEVEL 2

90

17%

LEVEL 3

167

31%

LEVEL 4

225

42%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

31

12%

LEVEL 2

48

18%

LEVEL 3

84

32%

LEVEL 4

97

37%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

45

18%

LEVEL 3

84

33%

LEVEL 4

97

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

195
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

53

19%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

123

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

211
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

45

16%

LEVEL 3

83

29%

LEVEL 4

128

45%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

155
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

22

12%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

106

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

157
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

10

6%

LEVEL 3

46

26%

LEVEL 4

111

64%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

8

15%

LEVEL 2

8

15%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

22

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

23

37%

LEVEL 4

26

41%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

173
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

87

30%

LEVEL 4

86

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

174
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

70

25%

LEVEL 3

92

33%

LEVEL 4

82

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

346
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

29

6%

LEVEL 2

81

18%

LEVEL 3

139

30%

LEVEL 4

207

45%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

356
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

67

15%

LEVEL 3

143

31%

LEVEL 4

213

47%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

30
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

27

35%

LEVEL 2

20

26%

LEVEL 3

17

22%

LEVEL 4

13

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

36
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

20

25%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

24

30%

LEVEL 4

12

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

334
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

80

18%

LEVEL 3

130

29%

LEVEL 4

204

46%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

340
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

64

15%

LEVEL 3

135

31%

LEVEL 4

205

48%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

42
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

26

29%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

16

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

52
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

26

25%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

32

31%

LEVEL 4

20

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

20

19%

LEVEL 3

28

27%

LEVEL 4

47

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

15

13%

LEVEL 3

35

30%

LEVEL 4

57

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

301
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

48

11%

LEVEL 2

81

19%

LEVEL 3

128

30%

LEVEL 4

173

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

300
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

75

18%

LEVEL 3

132

32%

LEVEL 4

168

40%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

343
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 484

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

94

19%

LEVEL 3

141

29%

LEVEL 4

202

42%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

367
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

47

9%

LEVEL 2

82

17%

LEVEL 3

153

31%

LEVEL 4

214

43%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

33
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

18

37%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

25
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

14

37%

LEVEL 4

11

29%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.