500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 129 PATRICIA LARKIN GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

326
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

66

13%

LEVEL 2

127

24%

LEVEL 3

214

41%

LEVEL 4

112

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

335
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 519

LEVEL 1

60

12%

LEVEL 2

124

24%

LEVEL 3

215

41%

LEVEL 4

120

23%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

160
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

102

40%

LEVEL 4

58

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

170
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

57

23%

LEVEL 3

107

43%

LEVEL 4

63

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

166
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

41

16%

LEVEL 2

55

21%

LEVEL 3

112

43%

LEVEL 4

54

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

165
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

41

15%

LEVEL 2

67

25%

LEVEL 3

108

40%

LEVEL 4

57

21%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

112
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

19

11%

LEVEL 2

43

25%

LEVEL 3

61

35%

LEVEL 4

51

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

120
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

36

21%

LEVEL 3

73

43%

LEVEL 4

47

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

39
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

5

9%

LEVEL 2

10

19%

LEVEL 3

27

50%

LEVEL 4

12

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

44
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

24

38%

LEVEL 4

20

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

165
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

42

15%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

120

43%

LEVEL 4

45

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

159
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

75

28%

LEVEL 3

110

41%

LEVEL 4

49

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

307
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

106

24%

LEVEL 3

199

45%

LEVEL 4

108

24%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

315
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

96

22%

LEVEL 3

196

45%

LEVEL 4

119

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

37

48%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

15

19%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

31

39%

LEVEL 2

28

35%

LEVEL 3

19

24%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

313
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

34

8%

LEVEL 2

101

23%

LEVEL 3

202

45%

LEVEL 4

111

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

315
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

90

21%

LEVEL 3

197

45%

LEVEL 4

118

27%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

32

45%

LEVEL 2

26

37%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

20
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

30

36%

LEVEL 2

34

40%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

15

15%

LEVEL 2

21

20%

LEVEL 3

42

41%

LEVEL 4

25

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

24

20%

LEVEL 3

48

40%

LEVEL 4

34

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

259
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

51

12%

LEVEL 2

106

25%

LEVEL 3

172

41%

LEVEL 4

87

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

253
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

45

11%

LEVEL 2

100

25%

LEVEL 3

167

42%

LEVEL 4

86

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

301
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

58

12%

LEVEL 2

118

25%

LEVEL 3

196

41%

LEVEL 4

105

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

314
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

57

12%

LEVEL 2

115

24%

LEVEL 3

197

41%

LEVEL 4

117

24%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

25
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

18

43%

LEVEL 4

7

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

21
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

18

55%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.