500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 107 THOMAS A DOOLEY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

57

15%

LEVEL 2

71

18%

LEVEL 3

115

30%

LEVEL 4

142

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

73

19%

LEVEL 2

81

21%

LEVEL 3

107

27%

LEVEL 4

131

33%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

30

16%

LEVEL 3

59

31%

LEVEL 4

75

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

39

19%

LEVEL 2

46

22%

LEVEL 3

48

23%

LEVEL 4

72

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

30

15%

LEVEL 2

41

21%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

67

35%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

34

18%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

59

32%

LEVEL 4

59

32%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

185
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

27

12%

LEVEL 3

77

35%

LEVEL 4

108

49%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

169
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

35

16%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

103

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

29
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

14

37%

LEVEL 4

15

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

23
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

7

19%

LEVEL 3

13

36%

LEVEL 4

10

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

39
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

42

36%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

22

19%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

51

40%

LEVEL 2

35

27%

LEVEL 3

26

20%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

40

12%

LEVEL 2

55

16%

LEVEL 3

106

32%

LEVEL 4

135

40%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

70

20%

LEVEL 3

97

28%

LEVEL 4

126

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

17

35%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

22

46%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

10

21%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

224
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

37

12%

LEVEL 2

57

18%

LEVEL 3

95

30%

LEVEL 4

129

41%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

206
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

65

21%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

120

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

33
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

20

30%

LEVEL 2

14

21%

LEVEL 3

20

30%

LEVEL 4

13

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

32
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

32

40%

LEVEL 2

16

20%

LEVEL 3

21

26%

LEVEL 4

11

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

16

16%

LEVEL 3

31

31%

LEVEL 4

47

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

20

22%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

43

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

179
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

52

18%

LEVEL 2

55

19%

LEVEL 3

84

29%

LEVEL 4

95

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

69

23%

LEVEL 2

61

20%

LEVEL 3

82

27%

LEVEL 4

88

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

245
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

48

14%

LEVEL 2

61

17%

LEVEL 3

108

31%

LEVEL 4

137

39%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

225
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

59

17%

LEVEL 2

73

20%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

124

35%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

12
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

9

29%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

5

16%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

13
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

14

40%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

6

17%

LEVEL 4

7

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.