500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 107 THOMAS A DOOLEY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

212
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

83

19%

LEVEL 2

134

31%

LEVEL 3

165

38%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

229
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

61

15%

LEVEL 2

121

29%

LEVEL 3

158

38%

LEVEL 4

71

17%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

28

14%

LEVEL 2

62

31%

LEVEL 3

83

42%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

83

40%

LEVEL 4

43

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

55

24%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

82

36%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

38

19%

LEVEL 2

62

31%

LEVEL 3

75

37%

LEVEL 4

28

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

148
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

67

27%

LEVEL 3

112

46%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

149
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

29

12%

LEVEL 2

64

26%

LEVEL 3

100

41%

LEVEL 4

49

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

18

35%

LEVEL 3

18

35%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

24
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

5

12%

LEVEL 2

14

33%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

10

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

38
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

44

34%

LEVEL 2

46

36%

LEVEL 3

33

26%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

53
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

23

19%

LEVEL 2

42

36%

LEVEL 3

42

36%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

115

33%

LEVEL 3

149

43%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

103

29%

LEVEL 3

148

42%

LEVEL 4

69

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

45

56%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

29

49%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

211
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

56

15%

LEVEL 2

119

31%

LEVEL 3

164

42%

LEVEL 4

47

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

223
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

91

26%

LEVEL 3

152

44%

LEVEL 4

71

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

27

63%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

26

42%

LEVEL 2

30

48%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

10

9%

LEVEL 2

25

23%

LEVEL 3

53

48%

LEVEL 4

22

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

28

25%

LEVEL 3

50

44%

LEVEL 4

26

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

137
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

73

23%

LEVEL 2

109

34%

LEVEL 3

112

35%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

52

17%

LEVEL 2

93

31%

LEVEL 3

108

36%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.