500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 107 THOMAS A DOOLEY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

100

24%

LEVEL 2

148

35%

LEVEL 3

116

27%

LEVEL 4

59

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

94

23%

LEVEL 2

155

38%

LEVEL 3

113

28%

LEVEL 4

46

11%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

40

21%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

75

39%

LEVEL 3

59

31%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

60

26%

LEVEL 2

81

35%

LEVEL 3

60

26%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

55

25%

LEVEL 2

80

37%

LEVEL 3

54

25%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

101
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

40

19%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

104
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

44

19%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

36

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

18

23%

LEVEL 2

26

34%

LEVEL 3

23

30%

LEVEL 4

10

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

26
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

8

14%

LEVEL 2

24

41%

LEVEL 3

19

33%

LEVEL 4

7

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

39

33%

LEVEL 2

44

37%

LEVEL 3

24

20%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

40

35%

LEVEL 2

46

41%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

58

16%

LEVEL 2

127

36%

LEVEL 3

112

31%

LEVEL 4

59

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

42

13%

LEVEL 2

134

41%

LEVEL 3

108

33%

LEVEL 4

46

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

42

63%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

52

67%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

171
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

79

21%

LEVEL 2

135

35%

LEVEL 3

114

30%

LEVEL 4

57

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

158
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

62

17%

LEVEL 2

145

40%

LEVEL 3

112

31%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

21

55%

LEVEL 2

13

34%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

32

74%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

31

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

13

10%

LEVEL 2

48

38%

LEVEL 3

40

32%

LEVEL 4

25

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

78

27%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

75

26%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

81

29%

LEVEL 2

107

38%

LEVEL 3

73

26%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.