500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 79 FRANCIS LEWIS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

317
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

104

23%

LEVEL 3

142

31%

LEVEL 4

175

38%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

322
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

52

11%

LEVEL 2

115

24%

LEVEL 3

131

27%

LEVEL 4

191

39%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

46

21%

LEVEL 3

76

34%

LEVEL 4

79

36%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

158
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

45

19%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

92

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

162
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

96

41%

MALE

PROFICIENT

164
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

99

39%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

164
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

28

14%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

105

53%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

196
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

29

12%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

141

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

54

34%

LEVEL 4

45

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

54

37%

LEVEL 3

39

27%

LEVEL 4

33

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

16

18%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

24

27%

LEVEL 4

21

23%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

22

23%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

30

32%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

81

20%

LEVEL 3

130

33%

LEVEL 4

168

42%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

311
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

98

22%

LEVEL 3

124

28%

LEVEL 4

187

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

19

31%

LEVEL 2

23

38%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

20

42%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

305
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

91

22%

LEVEL 3

132

31%

LEVEL 4

173

41%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

313
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

41

9%

LEVEL 2

104

23%

LEVEL 3

125

27%

LEVEL 4

188

41%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

9
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

11

35%

LEVEL 2

11

35%

LEVEL 3

6

19%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

158
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

35

17%

LEVEL 3

65

32%

LEVEL 4

93

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

153
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

49

22%

LEVEL 3

62

28%

LEVEL 4

91

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

82

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

169
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

34

13%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

69

26%

LEVEL 4

100

37%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.