500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 79 FRANCIS LEWIS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

35

8%

LEVEL 2

102

24%

LEVEL 3

131

31%

LEVEL 4

155

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

317
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

104

23%

LEVEL 3

142

31%

LEVEL 4

175

38%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

138
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

20

10%

LEVEL 2

47

23%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

72

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

155
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

20

9%

LEVEL 2

46

21%

LEVEL 3

76

34%

LEVEL 4

79

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

148
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

83

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

162
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

96

41%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

134
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

24

15%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

93

57%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

164
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

28

14%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

105

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

42

26%

LEVEL 3

64

40%

LEVEL 4

40

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

99
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

13

8%

LEVEL 2

45

29%

LEVEL 3

54

34%

LEVEL 4

45

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

14

16%

LEVEL 2

34

38%

LEVEL 3

24

27%

LEVEL 4

17

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

16

18%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

24

27%

LEVEL 4

21

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

12

3%

LEVEL 2

76

21%

LEVEL 3

116

33%

LEVEL 4

152

43%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

298
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

81

20%

LEVEL 3

130

33%

LEVEL 4

168

42%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

23

34%

LEVEL 2

26

39%

LEVEL 3

15

22%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

19
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

19

31%

LEVEL 2

23

38%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

275
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

83

22%

LEVEL 3

123

32%

LEVEL 4

152

40%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

305
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

91

22%

LEVEL 3

132

31%

LEVEL 4

173

41%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

10

25%

LEVEL 2

19

48%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

10

27%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

38

19%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

88

44%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

158
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

35

17%

LEVEL 3

65

32%

LEVEL 4

93

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

71

32%

LEVEL 4

67

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

82

32%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.