500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 79 FRANCIS LEWIS GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

383
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

34

6%

LEVEL 2

109

21%

LEVEL 3

188

36%

LEVEL 4

195

37%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

388
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

37

7%

LEVEL 2

100

19%

LEVEL 3

217

41%

LEVEL 4

171

33%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

192
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

48

19%

LEVEL 3

91

36%

LEVEL 4

101

40%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

201
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

41

16%

LEVEL 3

111

44%

LEVEL 4

90

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

191
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

61

22%

LEVEL 3

97

35%

LEVEL 4

94

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

187
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

59

22%

LEVEL 3

106

39%

LEVEL 4

81

30%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

226
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

7

3%

LEVEL 2

41

15%

LEVEL 3

103

38%

LEVEL 4

123

45%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

234
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

39

14%

LEVEL 3

115

41%

LEVEL 4

119

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

13

9%

LEVEL 2

32

22%

LEVEL 3

56

38%

LEVEL 4

47

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

91
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

57

42%

LEVEL 4

34

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

14

14%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

28

29%

LEVEL 4

22

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

14

14%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

43

43%

LEVEL 4

17

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

370
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

20

4%

LEVEL 2

86

18%

LEVEL 3

178

37%

LEVEL 4

192

40%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

367
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

24

5%

LEVEL 2

78

17%

LEVEL 3

201

43%

LEVEL 4

166

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

14

28%

LEVEL 2

23

46%

LEVEL 3

10

20%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

13

23%

LEVEL 2

22

39%

LEVEL 3

16

29%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

371
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 490

LEVEL 1

24

5%

LEVEL 2

95

19%

LEVEL 3

176

36%

LEVEL 4

195

40%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

375
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

93

19%

LEVEL 3

205

41%

LEVEL 4

170

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

10

28%

LEVEL 2

14

39%

LEVEL 3

12

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

12

41%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

187
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

47

19%

LEVEL 3

86

35%

LEVEL 4

101

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

195
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

50

19%

LEVEL 3

100

38%

LEVEL 4

95

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

196
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

62

22%

LEVEL 3

102

36%

LEVEL 4

94

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

193
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

50

19%

LEVEL 3

117

44%

LEVEL 4

76

29%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

377
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

97

19%

LEVEL 3

184

37%

LEVEL 4

193

38%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

381
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

34

7%

LEVEL 2

96

19%

LEVEL 3

211

41%

LEVEL 4

170

33%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

6

25%

LEVEL 2

12

50%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.