500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 20 JOHN BOWNE GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

435
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 656

LEVEL 1

65

10%

LEVEL 2

156

24%

LEVEL 3

217

33%

LEVEL 4

218

33%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

447
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 694

LEVEL 1

76

11%

LEVEL 2

171

25%

LEVEL 3

201

29%

LEVEL 4

246

35%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

205
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

36

12%

LEVEL 2

72

23%

LEVEL 3

96

31%

LEVEL 4

109

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

220
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

40

12%

LEVEL 2

81

24%

LEVEL 3

97

28%

LEVEL 4

123

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

230
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

84

24%

LEVEL 3

121

35%

LEVEL 4

109

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

227
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

90

25%

LEVEL 3

104

29%

LEVEL 4

123

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

372
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 486

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

87

18%

LEVEL 3

172

35%

LEVEL 4

200

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

379
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

34

7%

LEVEL 2

98

19%

LEVEL 3

155

30%

LEVEL 4

224

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

4

21%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

9

47%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

33

24%

LEVEL 2

60

43%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

33

23%

LEVEL 2

60

41%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

407
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 576

LEVEL 1

44

8%

LEVEL 2

125

22%

LEVEL 3

200

35%

LEVEL 4

207

36%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

420
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

48

8%

LEVEL 2

138

23%

LEVEL 3

185

31%

LEVEL 4

235

39%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

28
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

21

26%

LEVEL 2

31

39%

LEVEL 3

17

21%

LEVEL 4

11

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

28

32%

LEVEL 2

33

38%

LEVEL 3

16

18%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

341
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

35

7%

LEVEL 2

99

21%

LEVEL 3

161

34%

LEVEL 4

180

38%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

378
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

36

7%

LEVEL 2

107

21%

LEVEL 3

162

31%

LEVEL 4

216

41%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

94
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

30

17%

LEVEL 2

57

31%

LEVEL 3

56

31%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

69
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

40

23%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

9

23%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

17

43%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

22

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

407
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 616

LEVEL 1

62

10%

LEVEL 2

147

24%

LEVEL 3

206

33%

LEVEL 4

201

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

412
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

72

11%

LEVEL 2

159

25%

LEVEL 3

188

29%

LEVEL 4

224

35%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.