500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 20 JOHN BOWNE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

310
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 595

LEVEL 1

106

18%

LEVEL 2

179

30%

LEVEL 3

213

36%

LEVEL 4

97

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

87

16%

LEVEL 2

161

30%

LEVEL 3

189

35%

LEVEL 4

107

20%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

178
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

39

13%

LEVEL 2

79

27%

LEVEL 3

112

38%

LEVEL 4

66

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

162
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

68

26%

LEVEL 3

93

36%

LEVEL 4

69

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

132
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

67

22%

LEVEL 2

100

33%

LEVEL 3

101

34%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

134
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

58

20%

LEVEL 2

93

33%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

38

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

262
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

72

16%

LEVEL 2

126

27%

LEVEL 3

172

37%

LEVEL 4

90

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

247
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

55

13%

LEVEL 2

122

29%

LEVEL 3

159

38%

LEVEL 4

88

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

60%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

5

56%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

13

62%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

27

28%

LEVEL 2

38

39%

LEVEL 3

28

29%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

20

24%

LEVEL 2

30

36%

LEVEL 3

23

28%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

300
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 506

LEVEL 1

62

12%

LEVEL 2

144

28%

LEVEL 3

204

40%

LEVEL 4

96

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

284
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

54

12%

LEVEL 2

129

28%

LEVEL 3

177

38%

LEVEL 4

107

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

44

49%

LEVEL 2

35

39%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

33

43%

LEVEL 2

32

42%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

300
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

44

9%

LEVEL 2

139

29%

LEVEL 3

203

42%

LEVEL 4

97

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

279
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

106

25%

LEVEL 3

174

41%

LEVEL 4

105

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

62

55%

LEVEL 2

40

36%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

17
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

51

41%

LEVEL 2

55

45%

LEVEL 3

15

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

13

37%

LEVEL 4

10

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

4

14%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

12

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

287
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

103

18%

LEVEL 2

170

30%

LEVEL 3

200

36%

LEVEL 4

87

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

277
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

83

16%

LEVEL 2

155

30%

LEVEL 3

182

35%

LEVEL 4

95

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.