500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 164 QUEENS VALLEY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

202
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

73

20%

LEVEL 2

92

25%

LEVEL 3

109

30%

LEVEL 4

93

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

77

22%

LEVEL 2

107

30%

LEVEL 3

95

27%

LEVEL 4

79

22%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

41

22%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

41

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

88
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

45

24%

LEVEL 2

58

30%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

41

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

110
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

32

18%

LEVEL 2

36

20%

LEVEL 3

58

33%

LEVEL 4

52

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

49

29%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

38

23%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

76
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

26

21%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

44

35%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

65
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

22

19%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

37

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

69
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

20

16%

LEVEL 2

37

29%

LEVEL 3

40

32%

LEVEL 4

29

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

28

21%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

36

27%

LEVEL 4

25

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

24

25%

LEVEL 2

20

21%

LEVEL 3

33

35%

LEVEL 4

18

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

20

22%

LEVEL 2

29

32%

LEVEL 3

24

27%

LEVEL 4

17

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

44

14%

LEVEL 2

75

24%

LEVEL 3

99

32%

LEVEL 4

90

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

89

30%

LEVEL 4

75

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

29

49%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

10

17%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

28

48%

LEVEL 2

20

34%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

191
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

76

24%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

88

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

162
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

57

18%

LEVEL 2

91

29%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

76

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

25

48%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

20

42%

LEVEL 2

16

33%

LEVEL 3

9

19%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

29

32%

LEVEL 4

27

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

17

19%

LEVEL 2

22

25%

LEVEL 3

24

27%

LEVEL 4

25

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

71

26%

LEVEL 3

80

29%

LEVEL 4

66

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

85

31%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

54

20%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

201
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

69

19%

LEVEL 2

91

25%

LEVEL 3

109

30%

LEVEL 4

92

25%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

171
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

74

21%

LEVEL 2

101

29%

LEVEL 3

93

27%

LEVEL 4

78

23%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.