500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 164 QUEENS VALLEY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

29

8%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

123

35%

LEVEL 4

87

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

204
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

126

35%

LEVEL 3

113

31%

LEVEL 4

91

25%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

94
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

61

36%

LEVEL 3

57

33%

LEVEL 4

37

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

61

35%

LEVEL 3

56

32%

LEVEL 4

40

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

116
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

56

30%

LEVEL 3

66

36%

LEVEL 4

50

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

65

35%

LEVEL 3

57

31%

LEVEL 4

51

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

82
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

25

23%

LEVEL 3

38

34%

LEVEL 4

44

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

83
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

27

24%

LEVEL 3

40

35%

LEVEL 4

43

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

75
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

42

33%

LEVEL 3

49

39%

LEVEL 4

26

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

53

43%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

32

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

43
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

11

12%

LEVEL 2

36

40%

LEVEL 3

32

36%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

42
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

17

18%

LEVEL 2

33

36%

LEVEL 3

29

32%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

192
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

17

6%

LEVEL 2

87

29%

LEVEL 3

107

36%

LEVEL 4

85

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

90

31%

LEVEL 3

103

35%

LEVEL 4

90

31%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

12

20%

LEVEL 2

30

50%

LEVEL 3

16

27%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

18

28%

LEVEL 2

36

55%

LEVEL 3

10

15%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

204
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

100

31%

LEVEL 3

118

36%

LEVEL 4

86

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

194
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

24

7%

LEVEL 2

115

35%

LEVEL 3

107

32%

LEVEL 4

87

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

17

57%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

6

22%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

4

6%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

23

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

24

31%

LEVEL 4

25

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

165
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

101

35%

LEVEL 4

64

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

155
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

102

36%

LEVEL 3

89

31%

LEVEL 4

66

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.