500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 164 QUEENS VALLEY GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

53

14%

LEVEL 2

150

39%

LEVEL 3

124

32%

LEVEL 4

62

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

156

41%

LEVEL 3

112

29%

LEVEL 4

69

18%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

101
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

71

37%

LEVEL 3

63

32%

LEVEL 4

38

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

82

43%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

43

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

79

41%

LEVEL 3

61

31%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

29

15%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

63

33%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

75
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

13

10%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

42

33%

LEVEL 4

33

26%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

74
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

40

32%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

37

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

66
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

51

37%

LEVEL 3

50

36%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

18

14%

LEVEL 2

55

42%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

16

17%

LEVEL 2

42

46%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

9

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

13

14%

LEVEL 2

48

51%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

120

37%

LEVEL 3

118

36%

LEVEL 4

62

19%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

123

39%

LEVEL 3

108

34%

LEVEL 4

69

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

28

44%

LEVEL 2

30

47%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

28

43%

LEVEL 2

33

51%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

183
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

144

40%

LEVEL 3

121

34%

LEVEL 4

62

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

179
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

36

10%

LEVEL 2

145

40%

LEVEL 3

110

31%

LEVEL 4

69

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

20

69%

LEVEL 2

6

21%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

11

48%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

38

48%

LEVEL 4

15

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

24

28%

LEVEL 3

35

41%

LEVEL 4

18

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

131

42%

LEVEL 3

86

28%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

38

13%

LEVEL 2

132

44%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

51

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.