500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 219 PAUL KLAPPER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

77

22%

LEVEL 2

146

42%

LEVEL 3

99

29%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

88

23%

LEVEL 2

137

36%

LEVEL 3

118

31%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

78

44%

LEVEL 3

53

30%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

67

36%

LEVEL 3

69

37%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

46

27%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

46

27%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

60

32%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

49

26%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

67
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

50

36%

LEVEL 3

50

36%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

80
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

21

14%

LEVEL 2

50

33%

LEVEL 3

58

38%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

17
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

15

28%

LEVEL 2

22

41%

LEVEL 3

16

30%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

17

30%

LEVEL 2

20

35%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

33

29%

LEVEL 2

52

46%

LEVEL 3

23

20%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

42

33%

LEVEL 2

51

40%

LEVEL 3

30

23%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

117

45%

LEVEL 3

93

36%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

34

12%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

111

38%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

51

59%

LEVEL 2

29

34%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

54

62%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

118
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

57

18%

LEVEL 2

137

44%

LEVEL 3

95

30%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

148
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

66

20%

LEVEL 2

118

36%

LEVEL 3

116

35%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

20

61%

LEVEL 2

9

27%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

22

50%

LEVEL 2

19

43%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

9

11%

LEVEL 2

36

44%

LEVEL 3

31

38%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

12

14%

LEVEL 2

25

29%

LEVEL 3

39

46%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

85
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

110

42%

LEVEL 3

68

26%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

76

26%

LEVEL 2

112

38%

LEVEL 3

79

27%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.