500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 209 CLEARVIEW GARDENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

242
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

65

20%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

161

49%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

24

8%

LEVEL 2

63

20%

LEVEL 3

77

25%

LEVEL 4

146

47%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

31

20%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

73

47%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

37

26%

LEVEL 4

66

46%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

34

19%

LEVEL 3

39

22%

LEVEL 4

88

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

120
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

32

19%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

80

48%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

6

60%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

127
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

11

8%

LEVEL 3

19

13%

LEVEL 4

108

76%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

111
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

15

12%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

98

76%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

31

26%

LEVEL 3

45

38%

LEVEL 4

39

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

80
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

7

6%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

47

41%

LEVEL 4

33

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

13

22%

LEVEL 2

22

37%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

18

36%

LEVEL 3

11

22%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

38

15%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

152

59%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

199
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

44

18%

LEVEL 3

58

23%

LEVEL 4

141

57%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

18

25%

LEVEL 2

27

38%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

9

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

18

30%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

19

31%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

240
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

19

6%

LEVEL 2

60

19%

LEVEL 3

79

25%

LEVEL 4

161

50%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

221
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

57

19%

LEVEL 3

75

25%

LEVEL 4

146

49%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

160
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

33

17%

LEVEL 3

60

30%

LEVEL 4

100

50%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

35

19%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

86

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

16

12%

LEVEL 2

32

25%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

61

47%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

16

13%

LEVEL 2

28

22%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

60

47%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.