500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS/MS 200 MAGNET SCHOOL-GLOBAL STUDI GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

94

32%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

86

29%

LEVEL 2

119

40%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

50

32%

LEVEL 2

57

37%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

42

27%

LEVEL 2

64

41%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

41
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

44

33%

LEVEL 2

50

37%

LEVEL 3

33

24%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

44

32%

LEVEL 2

55

40%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

18

33%

LEVEL 2

17

31%

LEVEL 3

16

29%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

11

23%

LEVEL 2

17

35%

LEVEL 3

15

31%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

33

45%

LEVEL 2

31

42%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

30

41%

LEVEL 2

25

34%

LEVEL 3

16

22%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

34

30%

LEVEL 2

45

40%

LEVEL 3

27

24%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

39

31%

LEVEL 2

56

44%

LEVEL 3

23

18%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

86
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

93

41%

LEVEL 3

68

30%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

49

21%

LEVEL 2

98

42%

LEVEL 3

69

29%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

44

72%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

37

61%

LEVEL 2

21

34%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

87
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

83

31%

LEVEL 2

99

37%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

87
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

77

28%

LEVEL 2

113

41%

LEVEL 3

69

25%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

11

52%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

18

27%

LEVEL 2

23

35%

LEVEL 3

19

29%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

23

30%

LEVEL 2

26

34%

LEVEL 3

19

25%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

76

34%

LEVEL 2

84

38%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

63

29%

LEVEL 2

93

42%

LEVEL 3

52

24%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.