500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 159 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of August 22, 2018 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to the State鈥檚 new two-session test design and performance standards, the 2018 Grades 3-8 ELA and math results cannot be compared with prior-year results. The new baseline established this year will enable comparisons with student scores in 2019 and 2020

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2017

2018

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

246
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

61

19%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

142

45%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

263
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

52

16%

LEVEL 3

95

28%

LEVEL 4

168

50%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

31

22%

LEVEL 3

43

30%

LEVEL 4

63

44%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

28

17%

LEVEL 3

41

25%

LEVEL 4

87

52%

MALE

PROFICIENT

140
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

5

3%

LEVEL 2

30

17%

LEVEL 3

61

35%

LEVEL 4

79

45%

MALE

PROFICIENT

135
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

24

14%

LEVEL 3

54

32%

LEVEL 4

81

48%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

154
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

30

16%

LEVEL 3

56

30%

LEVEL 4

98

52%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

184
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

16

8%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

134

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

16

22%

LEVEL 3

29

40%

LEVEL 4

24

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

47
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

14

22%

LEVEL 3

22

34%

LEVEL 4

25

39%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

14

26%

LEVEL 3

17

32%

LEVEL 4

16

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

11

19%

LEVEL 2

20

35%

LEVEL 3

20

35%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

6

2%

LEVEL 2

53

18%

LEVEL 3

92

32%

LEVEL 4

139

48%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

41

14%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

165

56%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

8

28%

LEVEL 3

12

41%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

12

31%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

230
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

46

16%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

134

47%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

239
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

41

14%

LEVEL 3

87

30%

LEVEL 4

152

52%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

16
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

15

45%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

8

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

16

39%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

23

16%

LEVEL 3

49

35%

LEVEL 4

65

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

23

15%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

75

50%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

132
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

77

44%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

13

7%

LEVEL 2

29

16%

LEVEL 3

49

27%

LEVEL 4

93

51%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.