500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 159 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

21

7%

LEVEL 2

58

20%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

125

43%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

61

20%

LEVEL 3

106

34%

LEVEL 4

125

40%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

31

24%

LEVEL 3

43

33%

LEVEL 4

46

35%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

9

6%

LEVEL 2

28

20%

LEVEL 3

49

35%

LEVEL 4

56

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

27

17%

LEVEL 3

42

26%

LEVEL 4

79

50%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

9

5%

LEVEL 2

33

20%

LEVEL 3

57

34%

LEVEL 4

69

41%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

117
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

9%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

80

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

131
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

17

11%

LEVEL 3

57

38%

LEVEL 4

74

49%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

12

13%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

28

31%

LEVEL 4

30

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

4

4%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

25

27%

LEVEL 4

35

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

24

39%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

15

24%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

21

37%

LEVEL 4

13

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

45

18%

LEVEL 3

77

31%

LEVEL 4

119

48%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

46

17%

LEVEL 3

93

34%

LEVEL 4

124

46%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

16

37%

LEVEL 2

13

30%

LEVEL 3

8

19%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

10

26%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

13

33%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

189
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

51

20%

LEVEL 3

72

28%

LEVEL 4

117

46%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

207
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

52

19%

LEVEL 3

93

34%

LEVEL 4

114

42%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

21
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

13

41%

LEVEL 4

8

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

13

34%

LEVEL 4

11

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

21

15%

LEVEL 3

44

32%

LEVEL 4

66

49%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

6

4%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

69

48%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

100
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

37

24%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

59

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

33

20%

LEVEL 3

64

39%

LEVEL 4

56

34%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.