500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 94 DAVID D PORTER GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

107
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

28

13%

LEVEL 2

75

36%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

34

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

27

14%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

67

34%

LEVEL 4

39

20%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

30

32%

LEVEL 3

31

33%

LEVEL 4

23

25%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

28

30%

LEVEL 3

31

33%

LEVEL 4

25

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

45

38%

LEVEL 3

42

36%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

18

17%

LEVEL 2

36

35%

LEVEL 3

36

35%

LEVEL 4

14

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

50
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

39

38%

LEVEL 3

31

30%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

57
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

26

30%

LEVEL 3

35

40%

LEVEL 4

22

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

17

29%

LEVEL 3

27

46%

LEVEL 4

10

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

26
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

9

16%

LEVEL 2

22

39%

LEVEL 3

16

28%

LEVEL 4

10

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

13

31%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

12

27%

LEVEL 2

12

27%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

7

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

68

38%

LEVEL 4

31

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

98
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

39

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

10

33%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

16

47%

LEVEL 2

10

29%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

105
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

72

36%

LEVEL 3

71

36%

LEVEL 4

34

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

104
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

61

32%

LEVEL 3

65

35%

LEVEL 4

39

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

9

7%

LEVEL 2

50

37%

LEVEL 3

51

38%

LEVEL 4

25

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

34

31%

LEVEL 3

42

38%

LEVEL 4

26

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

19

25%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

22

29%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

18

21%

LEVEL 2

30

35%

LEVEL 3

25

29%

LEVEL 4

13

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.